Decision Making≈1 minBurden: LowEMA: High

Delay Discounting — 5-Trial Adjusting

A five-choice adaptive delay-discounting task that estimates a discount rate in about a minute.

ImpulsivityIntertemporal choiceSelf-control
Category
Decision Making
Typical duration
≈1 min
Participant burden
Low
EMA suitability
High

Try this task

Configure parameters and run an interactive preview exactly as participants will experience it. No data is recorded.

Configure preview

Adjust parameters below, then start the preview on the right.

Task parameters

The immediate option is always half: 500 now vs. 1000 later.

Euro by default, with the published amounts unchanged, as in the euro version of Mas-Cuesta et al. (2022); the original studies used US dollars.

The paper does not say where the options appeared in this task; its adjusting-amount task placed them at random on each trial. Here each side gets half of the five choices.

Koffarnus & Bickel (2014): the first delay is 3 weeks; each “later” choice moves to a longer delay and each “now” choice to a shorter one (8, 4, 2, 1 steps through 31 delays from 1 hour to 25 years). Outputs: ED50 (the delay at which the delayed amount is worth half) and k = 1 / ED50, with ln(k), flagged as a bound when the participant reaches either end of the delays. No practice: every choice counts. About 1 minute.

A year counts as 365.25 days and a month as 365.25 / 12 days, which reproduces the ED50 values of Koffarnus & Bickel (2014, Table 1).

≈1 minBurden: LowEMA: High

This is a researcher preview. No participant data is recorded.

Simulated participant view

9:41

Delay Discounting — 5-Trial Adjusting

A five-choice adaptive delay-discounting task that estimates a discount rate in about a minute.

No data is recorded

Participant experience on smartphone

Two option cards per choice: half the amount now or the full amount after a delay. The delay of each next choice depends on the previous answer.

When to use

Useful when delay discounting is measured repeatedly, e.g. daily in EMA, or when a full questionnaire would take too long.

When not to use

Less suitable when a study needs the precision of a longer procedure from a single session, or discount rates for several reward sizes.

How to use in a study

Choose the delayed amount (half of it is offered now) and the currency. Use the same amount across sessions so rates stay comparable. The defaults follow Koffarnus & Bickel (2014): 1,000 later vs. 500 now, a first delay of 3 weeks, and a year of 365.25 days, which reproduces the ED50 values of their Table 1.

Researcher-configurable parameters

  • Delayed amount (the immediate option is always half)
  • Currency
  • Left/right position of the options randomised (on by default; the paper's adjusting-amount task placed them at random)

Outputs collected

  • ED50: the delay at which the delayed amount is worth half
  • Discounting rate k = 1 / ED50, with ln(k)
  • Flag when the participant reaches the shortest or longest delay (k is then a bound)
  • Each choice with its delay and response time

Interpretation notes

The first delay is 3 weeks; each choice moves the next delay along 31 steps from 1 hour to 25 years. Five choices give a coarse estimate, which is why the task suits repeated measurement; average across sessions for stable individual rates.

Scientific evidence

  • Discount rates from the 5-trial task correlated with those from a longer adjusting-amount task in the original validation.

Read more

Related tasks

Add Delay Discounting — 5-Trial Adjusting to your ESM study on SMAAT — free to get started.